|
|
|
|
Long term – convergence is key |
|
IP over MPLS, clear winner |
|
Ethernet with transport-friendly
features? |
|
SONET with Ethernet cost/commodity
advantages? |
|
Near/Medium term – each has its place |
|
Ethernet lacks OAM for transport/larger
network |
|
SONET expensive for intra-cluster |
|
Virtual Concatenation, Link Capacity
Adjustment Scheme and Generic Framing Procedure allows Ethernet over SONET |
|
|
|
|
Designed to work with installed T640s |
|
OC-768c = Next step for ultra-high BW
pipes |
|
1999 - 2003 = deployment of 10G
circuits |
|
2003 - 2005 = aggregate existing 10G
circuits (link bundling) |
|
2005 / 2006 and beyond = deployment of
OC-768c |
|
Initial offering will be SR (2km), link
limited primarily by fiber chromatic dispersion |
|
Could be extended to IR (40km), link
limited by chromatic and polarization mode dispersion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering lessons: |
|
Multiplexing is most cost-effective
solution, at least initially |
|
Engineering challenges: |
|
Forwarding with intelligence at these
speeds |
|
Memory requirements – bandwidth and
capacity |
|
Power and cooling issues – temperature
stability of optics |
|
Chromatic and PMD (polarization mode
dispersion) compensation are needed for links beyond 40G |
|
Fiber capacity/readiness for more than
40G using single lamda |
|
As you approach technological limits,
cost rises asymptotically |
|
|