Defending the Campus
|
|
|
Ed Lopez – Emerging Technologies |
“The Headlines”
|
|
|
“’MafiaBoy’ DDoS Attack Via University
Network” |
|
“Postdoc Arrest Linked to Intellectual
Property Theft from University Labs” |
|
“Hack on University Exposes 1.4M Social
Security Numbers” |
|
“Universities Fear 6th of
Month as Klez Virus Re-erupts” |
|
“RIAA Sues Campus File-Swappers” |
|
“Weak Security Causes University to Ban
Unauthorized Wi-Fi on Campus Nets” |
|
“Campus Networks: Havens for Spammers?” |
|
“Vital Files Exposed in University
Hacking, 32,000 Students and Employees Affected” |
Our Users – Our Problem
|
|
|
Students – Bandwidth, Active Threat, No
Standards |
|
Faculty – Openess, Intellectual
Property, Communication |
|
Administration –
Privacy/Financial/Academic Data, Web Services |
|
Facilities/Security – Operations,
Logistics, Emergency Services |
|
Health Services – HIPPA, Medical
Support Systems |
|
Externals – Support for Gov’t Projects,
External/Joint Academics, Libraries, Research |
Security is in How We Access
Our Networks
|
|
|
Dormitories – Wired/Wireless, >1
host to 1 student |
|
Libraries – Shared systems,
public/anonymous access |
|
Commons – Wireless, rogues, ‘evil
twins’ |
|
Telecommuters – Commuting Students,
Off-Campus Housing, Fraternities/Sororities, ‘Starbucks’ and other community
outlets |
|
Educational Areas – May have
specialized requirements, especially science departments |
|
Health Services & Administration –
Autonomous but linked |
|
Externals – Dedicated support
requirements, threat from external security breaches |
Campuses – Crucibles for New
Technologies and Security Issues
|
|
|
Varied OS Support: Windows (multiple versions), MacOS, Linux,
BSD, Palm, PocketPC, new handhelds |
|
No Personal Firewall/Anti-Virus
Standards |
|
VoIP:
Internally supported, Vonage, etc. |
|
Authentication: Passwords (weak), Tokens, SSN vs. Unique
Number, Single Sign-On vs. Segmentation |
|
Wireless vs. Wired |
|
Many Back Channels: POP3, IM, IRC, P2P,
FTP, etc. |
|
Music: P2P vs. Legal Downloads |
What We Intended
What We Ended Up With
Firewalls Alone Are Not
Enough
|
|
|
|
A TCP/80 client session: |
|
Is it MSIE? |
|
Is it Mozilla Firefox? |
|
Is it a Warez P2P Session? |
|
Firewalls, even with application
intelligence, only deal with Layer 3&4 |
|
But with convergence of multiple
applications around well-known ports & protocols, how do we differentiate
the legitimate ones from the rogue ones? |
|
|
Layered Threats – Layered
Defenses
Domino Effect
Security Is Not Required for
Applications & Networks to Function!
|
|
|
Everything works in the lab! |
|
Trust is inherent to design! |
|
What are your policies? |
|
How are they enforced? |
|
How do you detect/prevent malicious
traffic, rogue host/apps, and misuse? |
|
What is really on your network? |
Security Requirements for
the Campus
|
|
|
Access Defense at Network/Data Centers
– No effective perimeters, no control of end-user hosts |
|
Network Awareness – Variable
users/access/technologies make for quickly changing threats |
|
QoS - defending bandwidth for necessary
resources, mitigating DoS attacks, policy conformance |
|
Segregation of IP Networks – With use
of common infrastructure |
|
Standardization Where Possible –
Enforcement of security processes is a must for applications, data centers,
and systems holding sensitive data |
|
Provisioned Services – Key to
consistant delivery of managable services |
Securing Access
|
|
|
|
Wireless Access = Remote Access |
|
Common solution sets mean ease of
deployment and common user experience |
|
Can implement roles-based policies |
|
SSL VPNs are your friend |
|
Clientless – Just need a browser |
|
Encryption offers confidentiality,
integrity of traffic |
|
Defend Remote Access, Wireless Access,
Access to Data Centers |
|
You can’t rely on host-based defenses,
defend at the ingress |
|
Perimeter defenses (Firewall, ACL) |
|
NAV and Anti-spam on campus web/mail
services |
Securing Data Centers
|
|
|
|
Best defenses are based on knowing what
to defend |
|
You may not control the clients, but
you do control the servers |
|
Tight perimeter defenses |
|
Portaling |
|
Intrusion Detection/Prevention |
|
Honeypots / Honeynets |
Importance of Network
Awareness
|
|
|
“Network awareness now a new mindset
for security professionals.” |
|
“Every component of the network is part
of the ecosystem.” |
|
“The end user is the moving chess piece
of the network board.” |
|
“The really good intruders study the
environment before attacking.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDS – Intrusion Detection
System
|
|
|
|
Typically out of line of the data flow
on a tap. Evaluates deeper into the
packet to validate protocol, search for exploits and anomalies. All 7 layers
of the OSI model can be parsed. |
IPS – Intrusion Prevention
System
|
|
|
|
Typically inline of the data flow. Evaluates deeper into the packet to
validate protocol, search for exploits and anomalies. All 7 layers of the OSI
model can be parsed. Does not have to rely on other devices in the network to
complete it’s task. |
Network Awareness – Know
Your Threat!
|
|
|
Who is peering with your critical
systems? |
|
Who are the IRC bots? |
|
Who is probing your network? |
|
Correlate security events to
hosts/network objects |
Network QoS – Managed
Unfairness
|
|
|
|
Bandwidth isn’t free and all traffic is
not equal |
|
Migration continues toward converged
network, with multiple services over IP |
|
Need to distinguish between the
multiple services on the converged network infrastructure |
|
Examples: voice and real-time video |
|
Implementing QoS allows us to utilize
existing bandwidth better |
|
QoS tools can be used as security tools
to safeguard priority network services and applications |
Segregating IP Networks - MPLS
Standardization
|
|
|
Openness applies to the user community,
not to campus administration and staff |
|
Deployed network applications and
services must be tightly defined |
|
IDS/IPS to look for malicious traffic
within these applications and services |
|
Standardized authentication systems –
centralized online identity control |
|
Operational & management support is
key to policy enforcement |
Provisioned Services
|
|
|
|
Bring all of these security concepts
together |
|
Portaling – Present services in a
consistent fashion, roles-based authentication |
|
Network Awareness – Defining and
provisioning services provides a clear scope |
|
QoS – Protect service resources |
|
Segregation – Reduces threat vectors
and malicious logic trees between services |
|
Standardization – Building security in
what we deploy |
|
Create an atmosphere of what we can do,
vs. what we can’t |
Juniper Networks Portfolio
Thank
You!
elopez@juniper.net